1631 E Cypress St Covina Ca 91724 Us 235d08070e66a5de03202683cc7ab0a7
1631 E Cypress St, Covina, CA, 91724, US
Neighborhood Overall
C
Schools
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing79thGood
Demographics57thGood
Amenities12thPoor
Safety Details
67th
National Percentile
-6%
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-10%
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address1631 E Cypress St, Covina, CA, 91724, US
Region / MetroCovina
Year of Construction1979
Units28
Transaction Date2005-07-18
Transaction Price$1,251,000
BuyerCYPRESS VILLAGE CONDOS LLC
SellerCYPRESS VILLAGE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP

1631 E Cypress St Covina 28-Unit Multifamily

Neighborhood-level occupancy is exceptionally tight, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data, while a relatively small renter-occupied share suggests constrained rental supply that can support stable leasing for well-positioned assets.

Overview

Located in Covina’s inner-suburban fabric of Los Angeles County, the property sits in a neighborhood with top-tier occupancy performance nationally and a rank at the very top among 1,441 metro neighborhoods. For investors, this indicates resilient tenant stickiness and reduced downtime risk compared with broader metro patterns.

Local livability leans car-oriented. Restaurants are competitive versus national peers, but other daily amenities within the immediate neighborhood cluster are limited, implying residents typically access services along nearby corridors. Average school ratings track modestly above national midline, which can aid retention for larger households without commanding premium pricing.

Vintage context matters: the neighborhood’s average construction skew is early-1980s, and this asset’s 1979 vintage is slightly older. That typically points to potential value-add through unit modernization, building systems upgrades, and common-area refreshes to stay competitive against newer stock.

Tenure dynamics show a lower renter concentration at the neighborhood level, translating to a thinner immediate renter base but also less direct competition from neighboring rentals. Within a 3-mile radius, household counts have trended up while average household size edges down, signaling more households — and by extension a broader renter pool — even as overall population growth is mixed. Elevated home values for the area reinforce reliance on rental housing, supporting pricing power and lease retention when managed thoughtfully.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Comparable neighborhood safety metrics are not available in this data release for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale metro cut. Investors commonly benchmark against city and county trend reports and observe on-the-ground conditions when underwriting.

Given the car-oriented pattern and dispersed amenities, typical investor practice includes assessing street-level visibility, lighting, and access control as part of property operations planning rather than drawing conclusions from block-level statistics.

Proximity to Major Employers
  • Ryder Vehicle Sales — corporate offices (8.8 miles)
  • Chevron — corporate offices (10.0 miles)
  • Waste Management — corporate offices (11.7 miles)
  • United Technologies — corporate offices (12.7 miles)
  • Edison International — utilities corporate offices (13.2 miles) — HQ
Why invest?

This 28-unit asset built in 1979 benefits from a neighborhood with top-tier occupancy performance and elevated local home values, both of which support steady renter demand and lease retention. The average unit size of roughly 1,250 sq. ft. suggests family-friendly layouts that can reduce turnover when paired with consistent maintenance and resident services. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, the surrounding area shows limited renter-occupied stock, which can moderate competitive pressure from nearby rentals while sustaining pricing for well-positioned communities.

From an operations and capital viewpoint, the late-1970s vintage points to targeted value-add opportunities — interiors, building systems, and curb appeal — to stay competitive against early-1980s and newer product in the broader metro. Within a 3-mile radius, households are expanding even as household sizes trend slightly smaller, supporting a broader renter pool over time and underpinning occupancy stability with thoughtful lease management.

  • Neighborhood-level occupancy sits at the top of metro rankings, supporting lower downtime risk.
  • Larger average unit sizes can aid family retention and reduce turnover costs.
  • High local home values reinforce renter reliance on multifamily housing, supporting pricing power.
  • 1979 vintage offers clear value-add paths through interior and systems modernization.
  • Risk: lower renter concentration nearby narrows the immediate tenant base, requiring focused leasing and marketing.