| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 35th | Poor |
| Demographics | 27th | Fair |
| Amenities | 23rd | Fair |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 200 N Birch St, Blythe, CA, 92225, US |
| Region / Metro | Blythe |
| Year of Construction | 1994 |
| Units | 33 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
200 N Birch St Blythe CA Multifamily Investment
Built in 1994, this 33-unit asset is newer than much of the local stock and benefits from competitive access to daily-needs retail; according to WDSuite’s CRE market data, renter affordability is comparatively favorable, supporting retention and steady leasing.
Livability is practical rather than amenity-rich. Neighborhood grocery access is competitive among Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario neighborhoods (stronger showing than many local peers), while restaurants sit above the metro median; parks, cafes, childcare, and pharmacies are sparse, which suggests residents rely on a tight set of daily conveniences and regional draws for discretionary needs.
For investors, the renter-occupied share at the neighborhood level is around one-third, indicating a focused but somewhat shallower tenant base than renter-heavy submarkets. The neighborhood occupancy rate trends softer than many peers, implying leasing may favor well-priced, well-managed properties and value-forward finishes. At the same time, rent-to-income sits in the top quartile nationally, pointing to relatively low affordability pressure that can aid retention and disciplined rent setting.
Demographic statistics aggregated within a 3-mile radius show population contracted in the last five years, but WDSuite’s outlook points to a modest population rebound by 2028 alongside a notable increase in households and smaller average household sizes. For multifamily, a larger household count with smaller households typically expands the renter pool and supports occupancy stability for attainable product.
Vintage positioning is a differentiator: the property’s 1994 construction is newer than the neighborhood’s older housing stock (average year 1970). That tends to improve competitive standing against pre‑1980s buildings, while still warranting capital planning for aging systems and selective upgrades to capture value-add upside.
Comparable neighborhood-level crime statistics are not available in WDSuite for this location. Investors typically benchmark conditions against city and metro sources and assess site-level factors such as lighting, visibility, and access controls as part of due diligence.
A prudent approach is to review trend data at the city and county level, consult recent insurer and lender assumptions, and align operating practices (e.g., security measures and resident screening) with underwriting expectations for similar Inland Empire neighborhoods.
This 33-unit, 1994-vintage property offers a relative quality edge versus older neighborhood stock and benefits from practical, everyday access to groceries and essentials. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, neighborhood occupancy runs softer than many metro peers, which elevates the importance of value positioning and hands-on leasing. However, renter affordability is comparatively favorable and the neighborhood’s renter concentration, while moderate, supports a consistent tenant base for attainable units.
Within a 3-mile radius, recent population softness is expected to give way to modest growth, with households projected to increase and average household size trending lower. That dynamic typically expands the renter pool and supports stabilized demand, while the local homeownership market’s relatively accessible values can create some competition but also reinforce the case for well-priced, renovated rentals.
- 1994 vintage positions the asset competitively versus older local stock, with targeted upgrades offering value-add potential.
- Renter affordability appears favorable, supporting retention and disciplined rent growth for attainable units.
- 3-mile household growth and smaller household sizes point to a broader renter pool over the medium term.
- Daily-needs access (notably groceries) underpins livability despite thinner lifestyle amenities.
- Risk: Softer neighborhood occupancy and limited amenities require competitive pricing, active management, and focused leasing execution.