4825 Hazel Ave Fair Oaks Ca 95628 Us 89e48557c9d3ca5b4d3fcd2de71987fe
4825 Hazel Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628, US
Neighborhood Overall
A
Schools-
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing72ndFair
Demographics83rdBest
Amenities51stGood
Safety Details
57th
National Percentile
-61%
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
9%
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address4825 Hazel Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628, US
Region / MetroFair Oaks
Year of Construction1987
Units78
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

4825 Hazel Ave Fair Oaks Multifamily Investment Positioning

Elevated home values and solid neighborhood incomes point to durable renter demand and support occupancy stability, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data.

Overview

Fair Oaks scores in the top quartile among 561 Sacramento–Roseville–Folsom metro neighborhoods by overall rating, reflecting balanced livability with steady multifamily fundamentals. Neighborhood occupancy is stable and above national medians, while the renter-occupied share indicates a smaller but durable tenant base; for investors this suggests consistent leasing with selective depth rather than broad, transient turnover.

Local amenity access is mixed but serviceable for suburban product. Restaurants and cafes index above national averages, and pharmacies are convenient; however, park and childcare density is limited. For renters, this typically supports day‑to‑day convenience while underscoring the importance of on‑site community features to compete with nearby options.

Within a 3‑mile radius, demographics show recent population growth with additional gains projected through the forecast period, alongside increases in households and high-income cohorts. This trend expands the potential renter pool and can support occupancy and renewal rates. Elevated ownership costs relative to incomes in the neighborhood context tend to sustain reliance on rental housing, which can underpin pricing power when managed with attention to affordability.

The property’s 1987 vintage is newer than the neighborhood’s average 1970s building stock, offering relative competitiveness versus older assets. Investors should still plan for targeted modernization of common areas and systems to support rent positioning, particularly as newer supply in the metro competes on finishes and amenities.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Safety indicators present a nuanced picture. Compared with the Sacramento–Roseville–Folsom metro, the neighborhood’s crime rank places it among higher‑crime areas; however, national comparisons are stronger, with overall safety measures testing above many neighborhoods nationwide.

Recent data point to year‑over‑year declines in violent‑offense estimates and moderate property‑offense levels, which can support leasing stability when paired with effective property management. As always, investors should underwrite security measures and insurance line items consistent with submarket norms.

Proximity to Major Employers

Proximity to established employers supports a stable renter base seeking commute convenience, particularly in technology, distribution, healthcare, and paper products. Nearby anchors include Intel Folsom, DISH Network Distribution Center, Cardinal Health, International Paper, and Xerox State Healthcare.

  • Intel Folsom FM5 — technology/R&D (3.3 miles)
  • DISH Network Distribution Center — logistics & distribution (12.1 miles)
  • Cardinal Health — healthcare distribution (13.4 miles)
  • International Paper — paper & packaging offices (18.0 miles)
  • Xerox State Healthcare — healthcare services (18.5 miles)
Why invest?

This 78‑unit asset benefits from a suburban location that ranks competitively in the metro with above‑median national occupancy indicators and a renter base supported by high local incomes. Elevated ownership costs in the neighborhood context tend to reinforce rental demand, while a moderate rent‑to‑income backdrop supports retention and measured pricing power. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, neighborhood livability and amenity access remain solid, with restaurants, cafes, and pharmacies testing above national norms.

Built in 1987, the property is newer than the area’s average 1970s vintage, offering relative competitiveness versus older stock and clear scope for targeted value‑add through unit and systems modernization. Demographic trends aggregated within a 3‑mile radius indicate population and household growth, expanding the prospective tenant pool and supporting leasing stability over the medium term.

  • Stable neighborhood occupancy and expanding 3‑mile renter pool support leasing consistency.
  • Elevated ownership costs and strong incomes reinforce reliance on multifamily housing.
  • 1987 vintage offers competitive positioning with upside from targeted renovations.
  • Amenity access (restaurants, cafes, pharmacies) above national norms aids retention.
  • Risks: ownership‑heavy tenure limits depth of the renter base; metro‑relative safety position warrants standard security and insurance underwriting.