| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 88th | Best |
| Demographics | 64th | Best |
| Amenities | 75th | Best |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 10930 Terra Vista Pkwy, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730, US |
| Region / Metro | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Year of Construction | 1985 |
| Units | 32 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
10930 Terra Vista Pkwy Rancho Cucamonga Multifamily Investment
Neighborhood occupancy has been notably stable and renter demand supported by a high-cost ownership market, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data. This positioning favors sustained leasing with room for value-add execution if operations and finishes are refreshed.
The property sits in an Urban Core pocket of Rancho Cucamonga rated A+ at the neighborhood level, indicating strong livability and consistent renter appeal relative to the Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario metro. Neighborhood occupancy is among the highest locally, supporting stable collections and lower downtime between turns; this is a neighborhood statistic, not property-specific performance.
Daily needs are well covered with grocery access ranked competitive among 997 metro neighborhoods and parks and childcare density in the top decile nationally. Restaurant options index above national norms, while cafes are less dense, suggesting convenience for residents without an overbuilt retail scene. Schools average roughly 4 out of 5 and rank near the top among 997 metro neighborhoods, a family-friendly signal investors often associate with steadier tenancy.
Home values trend elevated versus national benchmarks, which tends to sustain reliance on rentals and supports pricing power and retention. Median contract rents run high for the neighborhood relative to national levels, but rent-to-income indicators are not extreme by coastal standards, keeping affordability pressures manageable for prudent lease management.
Within a 3-mile radius, households have grown even as average household size edged down, and forward-looking estimates point to population growth and a larger household base. That expansion, combined with a renter-occupied share in the mid-30s at the neighborhood level, implies a solid tenant base for multifamily. The asset’s 1985 vintage is older than the neighborhood’s average construction year, creating potential for value-add upgrades and targeted capital planning to enhance competitive positioning. These conclusions are grounded in WDSuite’s multifamily property research and neighborhood data.
Safety indicators compare favorably versus national benchmarks, with violent-offense measures landing in the top quartile nationally and property-offense levels closer to the national middle. Recent year-over-year trends show declines in both categories, an encouraging directional signal for investor risk assessment.
Within the metro context, the neighborhood ranks above average among 997 Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario neighborhoods, pointing to comparatively better safety than many peer locations. These figures are neighborhood-wide and should be paired with property-level diligence and insurer guidance.
Proximity to a diversified employment base supports renter demand and retention, with access to food manufacturing offices, waste services, transport logistics, energy infrastructure, and a regional utility headquarters.
- General Mills — food manufacturing offices (6.8 miles)
- Waste Management — waste services (10.6 miles)
- Ryder Vehicle Sales — transport logistics and sales (11.8 miles)
- Kinder Morgan — energy infrastructure (12.0 miles)
- Edison International — utility holding company (29.8 miles) — HQ
This 32-unit asset benefits from neighborhood-level occupancy strength and an ownership market with elevated home values, which tend to sustain rental reliance and support pricing power. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, the neighborhood’s rent and amenity profile outperforms national averages, while schools and parks index high—factors that typically underpin steady renewal behavior.
Constructed in 1985, the property is older than the neighborhood’s average vintage, pointing to a clear value-add path through interior updates and system modernization to compete with newer stock. A growing household base within 3 miles and diversified nearby employers further reinforce demand durability, though lease management should monitor affordability pressure and potential shifts in renter tenure over time.
- Neighborhood occupancy strength supports stable collections and limited downtime
- Elevated ownership costs reinforce renter reliance and pricing power
- 1985 vintage offers value-add potential via unit and system upgrades
- Household growth within 3 miles and diversified employers bolster demand
- Risks: affordability pressure, aging systems, and shifts in renter-occupied share