| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 78th | Best |
| Demographics | 40th | Good |
| Amenities | 65th | Best |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 126 Linda Way, Upland, CA, 91786, US |
| Region / Metro | Upland |
| Year of Construction | 1978 |
| Units | 32 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
126 Linda Way, Upland CA Multifamily Investment
According to WDSuite’s CRE market data, the surrounding neighborhood shows steady occupancy and a high renter-occupied share, suggesting durable multifamily demand at the submarket level. These are neighborhood indicators, not property performance, and they point to potential leasing stability for investors conducting commercial real estate analysis.
The property sits in an A-rated neighborhood that ranks 120 out of 997 metro neighborhoods—competitive among Riverside–San Bernardino–Ontario submarkets. Neighborhood occupancy trends are above many national benchmarks, according to WDSuite, which supports the case for consistent tenant retention at the area level.
Daily needs and dining density are a clear strength: the neighborhood ranks near the top of the metro for grocery access (ranked 2 of 997) and is highly competitive for restaurants and cafes (ranks 23 and 8 of 997). This concentration of amenities can aid leasing velocity and resident satisfaction. That said, park access and formal childcare options are limited within the immediate neighborhood footprint, which may influence certain renter cohorts.
Home values in the neighborhood are elevated relative to national peers, and the value-to-income relationship is high by national comparison. In practice, a high-cost ownership market tends to sustain reliance on rental housing and can support pricing power, while a relatively high rent-to-income ratio calls for attentive lease management to protect retention.
Within a 3-mile radius, demographics indicate a large, economically diverse population with rising incomes over recent years and households projected to increase over the next five years. This points to a larger tenant base and supports occupancy stability, per WDSuite’s CRE market data.
Vintage and asset positioning: Built in 1978, the property is somewhat newer than the neighborhood’s average construction year (1973). That positioning can be competitive versus older stock, though investors should still plan for modernization of systems and selective renovations to meet current renter expectations.
Tenure and renter demand: The neighborhood shows a high share of renter-occupied housing units, indicating depth in the tenant base and steady multifamily demand at the neighborhood level.

Neighborhood safety indicators sit around the metro middle based on rank 577 out of 997, according to WDSuite. In practical terms, this suggests risk management and routine security measures remain part of standard operations rather than outliers for the region.
At the national level, the area compares closer to average on overall crime. Recent year-over-year volatility in incident estimates should be monitored as part of underwriting and operations planning, focusing on trend direction rather than short-term swings.
Nearby industrial and corporate employers provide a diversified employment base that supports renter demand and commute convenience, including Ryder Vehicle Sales, Waste Management, McKesson Medical Surgical, General Mills, and United Technologies.
- Ryder Vehicle Sales — logistics & fleet services (6.3 miles)
- Waste Management — environmental services (6.3 miles)
- McKesson Medical Surgical — healthcare distribution (9.1 miles)
- General Mills — food manufacturing (9.3 miles)
- United Technologies — aerospace & industrial (16.6 miles)
126 Linda Way offers investors exposure to a competitive Upland neighborhood with strong amenity access, a high renter-occupied share at the neighborhood level, and occupancy that trends above national medians, based on CRE market data from WDSuite. Elevated home values in the area reinforce reliance on rental housing, supporting demand depth and potential pricing power.
Constructed in 1978, the asset is slightly newer than the neighborhood average, offering relative competitiveness versus older stock while still presenting opportunities for modernization and selective value-add. Within a 3-mile radius, population scale and projected household growth point to a larger tenant base over time, supporting leasing stability.
- Competitive A-rated neighborhood with strong grocery, dining, and cafe density
- High neighborhood renter-occupied share supports depth of demand
- Elevated ownership costs in the area sustain renter reliance and potential pricing power
- 1978 construction provides a platform for targeted renovations and modernization
- Risks: limited parks/childcare access locally and mid-pack safety metrics warrant active operations management