| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 68th | Poor |
| Demographics | 29th | Poor |
| Amenities | 81st | Good |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 35 Lillian Ct, San Francisco, CA, 94124, US |
| Region / Metro | San Francisco |
| Year of Construction | 1978 |
| Units | 44 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
35 Lillian Ct, San Francisco 44-Unit Multifamily
High-cost ownership dynamics and steady neighborhood occupancy suggest durable renter demand near key job centers, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data.
Situated in San Francisco’s Urban Core, the property benefits from amenity density that is competitive among 193 metro neighborhoods. Cafes, groceries, parks, and childcare options rank in the top quartile locally and score well versus neighborhoods nationwide—conveniences that help support leasing and day-to-day resident satisfaction.
Neighborhood occupancy is 91.6% (neighborhood metric), pointing to stable baseline demand in this part of the metro. Within a 3-mile radius, the housing stock is near an even split between owner- and renter-occupied units, indicating a sizeable renter base to support absorption and retention.
Elevated home values (among the highest nationally) reinforce reliance on multifamily rentals, which can support pricing power and lease stability for well-positioned assets. At the same time, rent-to-income readings suggest manageable affordability pressure relative to local incomes—useful for revenue management and renewal strategy.
Demographics aggregated within a 3-mile radius show households have increased over the past five years and are projected to rise further, even as average household size trends smaller. This combination typically expands the renter pool and supports occupancy stability through cycles.
Safety indicators for the neighborhood track below the metro median, ranking 168th among 193 San Francisco-area neighborhoods and landing in lower national percentiles. For investors, that implies heightened operating attention to onsite security and resident communication compared with many parts of the metro.
Recent trend data show year-over-year declines in both violent and property offense rates, suggesting gradual improvement; however, underwriting should still account for elevated baseline rates relative to national comparisons, based on WDSuite’s CRE market data.
Proximity to major corporate offices expands the local renter base and supports retention for workforce-oriented units. Nearby employers span financial services, healthcare, and utilities as shown below.
- Celgene — biotech offices (2.7 miles)
- Charles Schwab — financial services (4.1 miles) — HQ
- McKesson — healthcare distribution (4.1 miles) — HQ
- McKesson Ventures — venture investment (4.1 miles)
- PG&E Corp. — utilities (4.2 miles) — HQ
Built in 1978, the asset is newer than much of the surrounding housing stock, offering relative competitiveness versus older buildings while leaving room for targeted modernization of systems and interiors. High amenity access and a sizable renter base nearby support absorption, and elevated ownership costs in the city reinforce reliance on rentals.
According to CRE market data from WDSuite, neighborhood occupancy trends point to steady demand, while 3-mile demographics indicate rising household counts and smaller household sizes that can expand the renter pool over time. Balanced against these strengths, investors should budget for enhanced security and thoughtful tenant engagement given below-median safety positioning.
- Newer 1978 vintage versus local average, with value-add and systems-upgrade potential
- Amenity-rich Urban Core location supports leasing and daily livability
- Elevated ownership costs in the city sustain multifamily rental demand
- 3-mile household growth and smaller household sizes point to a larger renter base
- Risk: below-median safety requires proactive security and resident communication