53 Apple Meadow Rd Hudson Ny 12534 Us 1e5f4227ef1090e7d338ddf1f6f61898
53 Apple Meadow Rd, Hudson, NY, 12534, US
Neighborhood Overall
A
Schools-
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing48thBest
Demographics55thFair
Amenities49thBest
Safety Details
-
National Percentile
-
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address53 Apple Meadow Rd, Hudson, NY, 12534, US
Region / MetroHudson
Year of Construction1981
Units58
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

53 Apple Meadow Rd Hudson Multifamily Investment

1981 vintage with scale (58 units) offers relative competitiveness versus older neighborhood stock, with renter demand supported by steady metro fundamentals, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data.

Overview

Hudson’s suburban setting around 53 Apple Meadow Rd pairs everyday conveniences with small-metro accessibility. Grocery and pharmacy density ranks near the front of the pack locally (both above the metro median among 45 neighborhoods), while cafes and restaurants are competitive among Hudson neighborhoods; nationally these amenity levels track close to mid-pack. Park access is limited within the immediate neighborhood, which may place added value on on-site open space.

For investors, the surrounding housing stock skews older than this asset (average neighborhood construction around the early 1950s), making a 1981 property relatively newer and potentially more competitive after targeted modernization of systems and interiors. Neighborhood occupancy runs below national medians, signaling some lease-up competition; disciplined management and differentiated finishes can help maintain absorption and retention.

Tenure patterns indicate a meaningful renter base. Within a 3‑mile radius, a substantial share of housing units are renter‑occupied, supporting depth of demand for multifamily product. Median rents in the neighborhood sit above many peer areas in the metro and have grown materially over the last five years, while rent-to-income levels remain manageable, which can support pricing power without undue affordability pressure.

Demographics aggregated within a 3‑mile radius show recent population essentially flat, with forward projections pointing to growth in both population and households. A larger tenant base and evolving household mix can underpin occupancy stability and leasing velocity if product is positioned to local preferences, based on CRE market data from WDSuite.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Comparable neighborhood-level crime data is not available in WDSuite for this location. Investors typically benchmark city and county trends and evaluate property-level measures (lighting, access control, and visibility) to contextualize safety and resident experience. Where possible, align underwriting assumptions with broader regional patterns and recent trend direction rather than block-level anecdotes.

Proximity to Major Employers

Regional employment centers within commuting range help support renter demand and retention at workforce-oriented properties. Notable nearby employer includes:

  • IBM — technology services (26.7 miles)
Why invest?

This 58‑unit, 1981 multifamily asset in Hudson stands relatively newer than the area’s mid‑century housing base, creating a clear value‑add path via selective renovations and system upgrades. Neighborhood occupancy trends indicate some leasing competition, but rent levels and rent‑to‑income dynamics suggest room for thoughtful pricing while sustaining retention. Demographic projections within a 3‑mile radius point to growth in population and households, supporting a broader tenant base over the medium term.

According to WDSuite’s commercial real estate analysis, amenity access for essentials (grocery and pharmacy) compares favorably within the metro, while limited park access places a premium on property amenities. Taken together, the asset’s scale, relative vintage, and steady demand drivers present a credible thesis for durable occupancy with upside through targeted upgrades and effective leasing strategy.

  • 1981 vintage is newer than surrounding stock, enabling value‑add repositioning to outperform older comparables.
  • Essentials access (grocery/pharmacy) ranks above metro median, supporting renter convenience and retention.
  • 3‑mile projections show population and household growth, expanding the tenant base for leasing stability.
  • Rent‑to‑income levels indicate manageable affordability pressure, aiding pricing discipline over time.
  • Risk: neighborhood occupancy sits below national medians, requiring focused leasing and competitive finishes.