| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 42nd | Good |
| Demographics | 35th | Fair |
| Amenities | 0th | Poor |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 390 Twisted Hickory Rd, Elizabethtown, NC, 28337, US |
| Region / Metro | Elizabethtown |
| Year of Construction | 1985 |
| Units | 24 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
390 Twisted Hickory Rd Elizabethtown Multifamily Investment
Neighborhood multifamily occupancy trends point to stable renter demand for this rural location, according to WDSuite s CRE market data. Investors should expect steady performance dynamics with a focus on retention over rapid rent trade-outs.
This rural submarket of Bladen County, NC carries a B+ neighborhood rating and is competitive among Bladen County neighborhoods (ranked 10 of 26). The area shows strong renter demand signals at the neighborhood level, with occupancy trending in the top quartile locally (ranked 3 of 26), which supports leasing stability and reduces downtime risk relative to lower-ranked pockets in the county.
Livability is defined by small-town dynamics rather than dense retail; WDSuite data indicate sparse access to daily conveniences (grocery, pharmacies, restaurants, and cafes rank near the bottom of the 26-neighborhood metro set). For owners, this typically shifts the value proposition toward quiet setting and housing availability over walkable amenities, which can influence marketing and tenant retention strategy.
School quality benchmarks are comparatively favorable for the metro, with the average school rating among the highest locally (ranked 1 of 26) and above the national median. Educational attainment within a 3-mile radius also trends strong for a rural area, with bachelor s degree share positioned near the top of the county and in the upper half nationally, which can broaden the potential renter pool for well-maintained units.
Vintage context matters: built in 1985, the asset is somewhat newer than the neighborhood s average construction year (1979). That relative youth can improve competitive positioning versus older stock, though investors should still plan for system upgrades and possible value-add renovations to meet current renter expectations.
Tenure dynamics suggest a meaningful but not dominant renter base at the neighborhood level (renter-occupied share is above the metro median), indicating depth for multifamily demand while still competing with ownership options. With home values well below national norms, ownership is comparatively accessible, which can temper pricing power; however, rents also sit low versus national levels and rent-to-income measures land near the national midpoint, helping support retention and occupancy management.
Comparable safety metrics for this neighborhood are not available in WDSuite s current dataset. Without ranked or percentile data to benchmark against the 26 neighborhoods in Bladen County, investors should treat safety as a confirm-and-verify item during diligence by reviewing recent local reports and trends over time.
Given the rural context and limited on-site amenity mix, operators often emphasize lighting, access control, and resident engagement policies as practical risk management measures, alongside coordination with local resources for up-to-date neighborhood trend insights.
WDSuite s dataset does not surface verifiable nearby anchor employers with distance measurements for this address. Investors may consider the broader Bladen County employment base and commuting patterns to evaluate workforce housing demand and potential leasing durability.
This 24-unit, 1985-vintage property benefits from a neighborhood with strong occupancy performance relative to other parts of Bladen County, supporting day-one stability and lower expected downtime. The rural location means limited walkable amenities, but competitive school benchmarks and a renter base above the metro median suggest a consistent tenant pool. Low regional home values create some competition from ownership, yet comparatively low rents and midrange rent-to-income dynamics can support retention and steady operations, according to CRE market data from WDSuite.
Relative to older local stock, the 1985 vintage provides a foothold for light value-add and systems modernization to enhance competitiveness. The investment case emphasizes durable occupancy, pragmatic rent management, and targeted capital planning rather than outsized growth assumptions.
- Neighborhood occupancy ranks in the top tier locally (3 of 26), supporting leasing stability
- 1985 construction offers competitive positioning versus older area stock with room for modernization
- Renter-occupied share above the metro median indicates depth for multifamily demand
- Low rents and midrange rent-to-income dynamics favor retention and predictable operations
- Risks: rural amenity scarcity and accessible homeownership can temper pricing power; confirm safety trends during diligence