101 Spann St Connelly Springs Nc 28612 Us Ae3ba35a560ff3cd30eccc0b4cf646d2
101 Spann St, Connelly Springs, NC, 28612, US
Neighborhood Overall
B+
Schools-
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing27thPoor
Demographics54thBest
Amenities35thBest
Safety Details
66th
National Percentile
2%
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-44%
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address101 Spann St, Connelly Springs, NC, 28612, US
Region / MetroConnelly Springs
Year of Construction1987
Units24
Transaction Date2016-03-31
Transaction Price$852,500
BuyerRUTHERFORD SQUARE APARTMENTS LIMITED PAR
SellerRUTHERFORD COLLEGE HOUSING LIMITED PARTN

101 Spann St, Connelly Springs Multifamily Opportunity

Renter demand is supported by everyday amenities and relatively modest rents in a rural pocket of the Hickory–Lenoir–Morganton metro, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data. Expect steady leasing from workforce households with measured pricing power rather than outsized growth.

Overview

The property sits in a rural neighborhood that is competitive among Hickory–Lenoir–Morganton neighborhoods (among 130) for daily-needs access, with groceries, parks, and pharmacies represented locally, while restaurants and cafés are limited. This mix supports day-to-day livability for renters but suggests fewer lifestyle-driven premiums.

Neighborhood occupancy trends run below the metro median, pointing to more balanced negotiations on rent growth and a need for hands-on leasing and retention. Renter concentration is modest (about one-fifth of housing units are renter-occupied), implying a thinner but stable tenant base; marketing should target local workforce segments and value-focused renters.

Within a 3-mile radius, households have increased over the past five years even as the population slightly contracted, indicating smaller household sizes and a gradual shift toward more households—a dynamic that can broaden the renter pool and support occupancy stability. Forward-looking estimates point to additional household growth, which should add depth to multifamily demand over time.

Home values in this submarket are lower relative to many metros, and rent-to-income ratios are also low, which supports retention and reduces affordability pressure but may limit near-term pricing power. For investors, this tilts the thesis toward durable cash flow from attainable rents rather than aggressive rent-ups.

Vintage matters: built in 1987, the asset is newer than the neighborhood’s average construction year and should be more competitive than older local stock. That said, core systems and finishes are now decades old; targeted modernization can sharpen positioning without overcapitalizing.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Safety indicators are generally favorable compared with national norms, with the neighborhood scoring above the national median on key measures. Within the metro (130 neighborhoods), the area is competitive rather than top-tier, which aligns with a steady, workforce-oriented renter profile.

Recent trends are mixed: violent offense estimates have eased year over year, while property offense estimates showed an uptick. For underwriting and operations, this argues for routine property-level security measures and resident engagement, not a thesis-changing risk.

Proximity to Major Employers

Regional employment is anchored by large utilities and home improvement corporate offices within commuting distance, supporting workforce housing demand and lease stability for value-oriented units. This employment base includes Duke Energy and Lowe’s.

  • Duke Energy — utilities (34.7 miles)
  • Lowe's — home improvement corporate offices (40.0 miles) — HQ
Why invest?

This 1987 vintage, 24-unit property fits a durable, cash-flow orientation in a rural North Carolina submarket. Neighborhood occupancy sits below the metro median, and renter concentration is modest, so the thesis leans on steady demand from local households rather than premium amenity pricing. According to commercial real estate analysis from WDSuite, the area offers solid access to daily-needs amenities but limited dining and café options—supporting baseline livability with measured rent growth expectations.

Households within a 3-mile radius have grown despite a slight population decline, signaling smaller household sizes and a gradually expanding renter pool. Lower home values and low rent-to-income ratios support retention and consistent collections, though they can cap pricing power. Being newer than the neighborhood average, the 1987 construction should remain competitive against older stock, with value-add potential through focused system upgrades and interior refreshes to improve lease-up velocity and renewal capture.

  • Workforce-driven demand with steady cash flow orientation in a rural metro pocket
  • 1987 vintage offers relative competitiveness versus older local stock; targeted modernization can lift positioning
  • Daily-needs amenities nearby support renter retention; limited dining/cafés temper rent premiums
  • 3-mile household growth expands the tenant base and supports occupancy stability
  • Risks: owner-leaning market and low rent-to-income may limit pricing power; maintain active leasing and renewals