| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 27th | Fair |
| Demographics | 35th | Fair |
| Amenities | 61st | Best |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 325 Eller Branch Rd, Robbinsville, NC, 28771, US |
| Region / Metro | Robbinsville |
| Year of Construction | 2002 |
| Units | 32 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
325 Eller Branch Rd Robbinsville, NC Multifamily Investment
Positioned in a rural Graham County submarket with improving occupancy trends, this 32-unit asset offers durable renter demand supported by a moderate renter concentration in the neighborhood, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data.
Robbinsville’s neighborhood context skews rural with everyday conveniences nearby. Amenity access (grocery, pharmacy, parks, and cafes) ranks 1st among 8 neighborhoods in Graham County, indicating competitive access locally, while national percentiles suggest a middle-of-the-pack footprint for small-town markets. For investors, this supports day-to-day livability that can aid leasing and retention, even if destination retail is limited.
The property’s 2002 vintage is newer than the area’s average construction year (1965) and should remain relatively competitive versus older stock. Investors should still budget for targeted modernization as systems approach mid-life, but the age profile is generally favorable for operations compared with legacy assets common in the area.
Neighborhood occupancy is below national norms but has improved over the last five years, indicating gradually firming fundamentals. Renter-occupied housing accounts for roughly a third of units in the neighborhood, pointing to a moderate tenant base that can support steady leasing in stable periods. Median rents relative to incomes are low, which can help mitigate affordability pressure and support retention, though it may limit near-term pricing power.
Demographic statistics aggregated within a 3-mile radius show a small local population and signals of contraction over recent years. Smaller household sizes and a limited pool of higher-degree holders suggest demand will be driven by local workforce and long-term residents rather than in-migration. For investors, this favors disciplined lease management and tenant retention strategies over rapid growth assumptions grounded in commercial real estate analysis.
Home values sit on the lower end relative to national benchmarks, making ownership more accessible in this market. That can create competition for renters who can buy; however, it also underscores the role of multifamily as a flexible option that can sustain occupancy with the right value proposition and management focus.
Comparable safety insights at the neighborhood level are limited, and specific crime metrics are not available in the current dataset. Investors should interpret safety through broader market context, on-the-ground diligence, and trend review across Graham County rather than block-level assumptions.
Practical underwriting steps include confirming recent trends with local public records, property managers, and insurers; aligning security measures with resident expectations; and comparing premiums and incident history to nearby submarkets to gauge relative risk and potential operating costs.
This 32-unit asset built in 2002 offers a comparatively newer vintage in a rural neighborhood where much of the housing stock is older. Neighborhood occupancy has trended higher in recent years, and a moderate share of renter-occupied units supports a stable tenant base. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, local amenities are competitive within Graham County, helping day-to-day livability that can aid leasing and retention even as the national positioning remains modest.
Key considerations include a small and contracting local population, below-national occupancy levels, and more accessible ownership that can compete with renting. These dynamics point to an operating strategy centered on retention, value-forward unit presentation, and selective upgrades to maintain a leasing edge over older stock while being measured on rent growth expectations.
- Newer 2002 vintage relative to the area’s older stock supports competitive positioning
- Neighborhood occupancy has improved over five years, aiding stability
- Moderate renter concentration provides a defined tenant base for workforce housing
- Amenity access is strong locally, supporting day-to-day livability and retention
- Risks: small/contracting population, below-national occupancy, and ownership competition may temper rent growth