3100 Daniel Mccall Dr Lufkin Tx 75904 Us 09e5367fcd1f4bc94e5f9194b302f638
3100 Daniel McCall Dr, Lufkin, TX, 75904, US
Neighborhood Overall
A+
Schools
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing56thBest
Demographics44thGood
Amenities51stBest
Safety Details
-
National Percentile
-
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address3100 Daniel McCall Dr, Lufkin, TX, 75904, US
Region / MetroLufkin
Year of Construction2012
Units80
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

3100 Daniel McCall Dr, Lufkin TX Multifamily Investment

Renter demand is supported by a high renter-occupied share in the surrounding neighborhood and everyday convenience amenities, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data. Investors should weigh current neighborhood occupancy softness against projected household growth within a 3-mile radius.

Overview

The property sits in an Inner Suburb location within the Lufkin, TX metro. The neighborhood is rated A+ and ranks 2 out of 41 locally—Top quartile among 41 metro neighborhoods—signaling comparatively strong local fundamentals versus other Lufkin areas. Grocery and dining access are strengths: neighborhood grocery density ranks 2 of 41 and restaurants rank 3 of 41, placing these amenities in competitive territory locally and above national midpoints. Parks and pharmacies are limited within the immediate neighborhood, which may reduce some lifestyle appeal compared with amenity-rich submarkets.

For renters, the unit tenure profile is favorable to multifamily: renter-occupied housing is elevated (62.6% at the neighborhood level), indicating a deeper tenant base and potential leasing depth. However, neighborhood occupancy of 84.9% sits below metro and national norms, pointing to the need for active leasing and asset positioning to sustain stability. Median contract rents are near national midpoints, which can aid relative affordability and support retention. Home values are elevated relative to local incomes (value-to-income ranks near the top locally), which can sustain renter reliance on multifamily housing and support pricing power when operations are well managed.

Within a 3-mile radius, recent population and household counts have been modestly lower over the past five years, while WDSuite’s projections indicate a potential rebound through 2028 with growth in both households and income levels—signals that could expand the renter pool and support future occupancy. School ratings in the neighborhood benchmark below national averages, which may temper family-driven demand, but proximity to daily-needs retail and services helps support day-to-day livability. For investors conducting commercial real estate analysis, the combination of a high renter-occupied share and improving forward demographics warrants close monitoring of lease trade-outs and renewal strategies.

Vintage context matters: the neighborhood’s average construction year trends older (early 1990s). With a 2012 build, this property competes favorably versus older stock while still potentially benefiting from selective modernization to enhance energy systems, finishes, and curb appeal—typical levers for bolstering absorption and renewal capture in maturing Class B/B+ cohorts.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Comparable metro crime ranks and national percentiles are not available for this neighborhood in the current WDSuite release. Investors should rely on multiple sources and trend views (city and county reports, insurer data, and on-the-ground observations) to assess safety conditions over time rather than single-point estimates.

As with most secondary Texas markets, a practical approach is to evaluate multi-year trends, daytime versus nighttime activity, and property-level security design (lighting, visibility, access control). Positioning and tenant quality typically influence leasing stability as much as broader neighborhood statistics.

Proximity to Major Employers

Verified nearby employer details with precise distances are not available in this dataset. Investors may wish to validate major healthcare, education, manufacturing, and retail hubs serving the Lufkin area to gauge commuter flows and workforce housing demand.

Why invest?

Built in 2012, this 80-unit asset offers a relatively newer vintage versus the neighborhood’s older housing stock, supporting competitive positioning with potential to capture demand from renters seeking modern layouts and systems. The surrounding neighborhood shows a high renter-occupied share, strong access to daily-needs retail and dining, and home values that are elevated relative to incomes—factors that can sustain renter reliance on multifamily housing and support pricing power when operations are executed well. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, neighborhood occupancy levels are currently below broader benchmarks, so hands-on leasing and targeted upgrades may be important to drive stabilization.

Within a 3-mile radius, recent softness in population and households is expected to reverse with projected growth through 2028, expanding the tenant base and aiding long-term absorption and renewal capture. School ratings benchmark below national averages and parks access is limited locally, so underwriting should account for marketing and amenity strategies that appeal to cost-conscious renters prioritizing convenience and everyday services.

  • 2012 vintage competes well versus older neighborhood stock; selective upgrades can enhance rent trade-outs.
  • Elevated renter-occupied share indicates a deeper tenant base supporting leasing velocity and renewal potential.
  • Strong access to grocery and dining underpins daily convenience and supports retention.
  • Outlook: projected growth in households within 3 miles expands the renter pool and supports occupancy over time.
  • Risks: neighborhood occupancy lags broader norms; lower school ratings and limited parks may require targeted positioning.