428 Coleman St Marlin Tx 76661 Us C85379a1b00b537a1af78484fc9f021f
428 Coleman St, Marlin, TX, 76661, US
Neighborhood Overall
B-
Schools
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing21stPoor
Demographics23rdPoor
Amenities60thBest
Safety Details
-
National Percentile
-
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address428 Coleman St, Marlin, TX, 76661, US
Region / MetroMarlin
Year of Construction1972
Units28
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

428 Coleman St, Marlin TX Multifamily Investment

Positioned in a suburban pocket of the Waco metro, the neighborhood shows mid-pack fundamentals and accessible rents that can support steady renter demand, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data.

Overview

This Marlin address sits within the Waco, TX metro and carries a B- neighborhood rating with a mid-pack rank (49 out of 92 metro neighborhoods), indicating balanced but not leading fundamentals. Amenity access is a relative strength: cafes, parks, and pharmacies rank in the top quartile among Waco neighborhoods, while grocery and restaurant density is competitive within the metro. These day-to-day conveniences help leasing and retention even when broader occupancy is mixed.

Neighborhood occupancy is measured at the neighborhood level, not the property. At roughly the lower end of Waco outcomes (ranked 82 of 92; low national percentile), occupancy signals room for improvement and the need for active leasing strategy. Rent levels start from a low base locally, and the rent-to-income ratio sits in a stronger national position, which can aid retention and moderate pricing power for value-oriented units.

Within a 3-mile radius, recent population trends have been modestly negative, but WDSuite indicates growth in both population and households through 2028, pointing to a larger tenant base over time. Projections also suggest smaller household sizes ahead, which can translate into increased demand for rental housing, especially compact units. The renter-occupied share within the 3-mile area is about 30%, indicating a modest renter concentration and a smaller — but serviceable — pool of prospective tenants for a 28-unit asset.

Ownership costs in the surrounding area are comparatively low by national standards, which can create competition with entry-level ownership and temper rent growth expectations. School ratings benchmark low nationally, which may limit appeal to some family renters but has less impact on studios and smaller formats. The subject’s 1972 vintage is older than the neighborhood’s average construction year (1984), implying potential capital expenditure needs alongside value-add and repositioning opportunities to differentiate versus older stock.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Safety indicators here are best interpreted directionally. WDSuite does not provide a ranked crime score for this neighborhood in the current release, so investors should rely on regional trends and property-level diligence rather than block-level conclusions. Comparative framing to the broader Waco metro and on-the-ground verification will provide the most reliable view for underwriting.

Proximity to Major Employers
Why invest?

The investment case centers on attainable rents, everyday amenities, and value-add potential from a 1972-vintage, 28-unit asset. Neighborhood occupancy sits below the metro median, so active leasing and targeted renovations can be important to stabilize performance; however, low rent-to-income pressure and competitive amenity access support retention for value-focused renters. Based on commercial real estate analysis from WDSuite, forward-looking demographics within a 3-mile radius point to growth in households and a gradually expanding renter pool, which can support occupancy stabilization over a longer hold.

The area’s comparatively low ownership costs suggest some competition with entry-level ownership, which may cap pricing power; pairing operational discipline with selective upgrades can help the property compete. Given the asset’s older vintage relative to neighborhood stock, investors should plan for systems and interior updates to unlock leasing velocity and durability.

  • Value-add upside from 1972 vintage via targeted renovations and modernization
  • Amenity access (cafes, parks, pharmacies, grocery) supports leasing and retention
  • Low rent-to-income pressure aids retention and steady cash flow potential
  • Risks: below-metro neighborhood occupancy, low school ratings, and competition from accessible ownership