| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 41st | Fair |
| Demographics | 23rd | Good |
| Amenities | 26th | Good |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 601 Athol Ln, Pearsall, TX, 78061, US |
| Region / Metro | Pearsall |
| Year of Construction | 1992 |
| Units | 39 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
601 Athol Ln, Pearsall, TX Multifamily Investment Snapshot
Neighborhood occupancy trends and a sizable renter pool within a 3-mile radius point to steady tenant demand, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data. The assets suburban-rural setting supports workforce housing dynamics, with modest rents helping lease retention.
Pearsall is a rural market where day-to-day conveniences are present but limited relative to larger metros. The neighborhood ranks above the metro median (3 of 7 neighborhoods) and sits in the lower national percentiles for overall amenities, though cafes and restaurants show comparatively better density than other local categories. Investors should underwrite modest walkable amenity draw and reliance on driving for most services.
Neighborhood occupancy is reported at 85.9%, which suggests room to capture additional leasing with focused operations; note that this is a neighborhood metric, not the propertys performance. Median asking rents in the area are modest, reinforcing affordability and potential retention but also implying measured revenue growth unless value-add improvements support premium positioning.
The propertys 1992 vintage is older than the neighborhoods average construction year (2002). That age gap points to pragmatic capital planning needs and an opportunity for targeted renovations or systems modernization to improve competitiveness against newer stock.
Within a 3-mile radius, demographics indicate population and household growth, which can expand the tenant base and support occupancy stability. Renter-occupied housing comprises a meaningful share of units (over half within 3 miles), signaling depth for multifamily demand even as ownership options remain accessible in this market.
Home values in the neighborhood are comparatively low versus national norms, which means ownership is more attainable than in high-cost markets; for investors, that can create competition with entry-level ownership while also supporting steady multifamily demand among residents prioritizing flexibility or near-term affordability. School ratings trend below national averages, which may affect family-driven leasing strategies but is less critical for workforce-oriented demand.

Neighborhood-specific crime metrics are not available in the current WDSuite dataset for this location. Investors typically benchmark safety using city and county sources and compare trends to nearby Pearsall neighborhoods to gauge relative conditions over time.
This 39-unit, 1992-vintage asset in Pearsall sits in a workforce-oriented submarket where neighborhood occupancy is reported at 85.9% and rents are modest. Based on CRE market data from WDSuite, the immediate area shows a meaningful renter base within 3 miles and signs of population and household growth, which can bolster leasing fundamentals as operations focus on resident retention and incremental lease-up.
The propertys older vintage relative to neighborhood norms suggests a straightforward value-add path: selective interior upgrades, common-area refresh, and systems planning to sharpen competitive positioning against newer product. Investors should also underwrite small-market dynamicsincluding limited amenities and lower school ratingsand potential competition from attainable ownership, balancing these against stable workforce housing demand.
- Workforce housing demand with a sizable renter-occupied base within 3 miles supports leasing stability.
- 1992 vintage offers value-add and capital planning opportunities versus newer neighborhood stock.
- Neighborhood occupancy at 85.9% points to leasing upside with focused operations and unit upgrades.
- Risks: small-market scale, limited amenities, lower school ratings, and competition from attainable ownership.