703 Kroschel St Hallettsville Tx 77964 Us 9ae3a427c7fd744648aa82c6d0c6bd3c
703 Kroschel St, Hallettsville, TX, 77964, US
Neighborhood Overall
B-
Schools
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing43rdGood
Demographics46thFair
Amenities10thGood
Safety Details
-
National Percentile
-
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address703 Kroschel St, Hallettsville, TX, 77964, US
Region / MetroHallettsville
Year of Construction2005
Units20
Transaction Date2006-09-20
Transaction Price$239,700
BuyerSIGG KEITH ALAN
SellerSIGG KEITH ALAN

703 Kroschel St, Hallettsville, TX Multifamily Investment

Positioned in a rural submarket with relatively accessible rents, this 2005-vintage asset offers a practical workforce housing play where lease retention may benefit from modest rent-to-income levels, according to CRE market data from WDSuite.

Overview

Hallettsville’s neighborhood context skews rural, with limited cafe, park, and pharmacy density, while basic conveniences like grocery access are present but spread out. Amenity access ranks above the metro median (6th of 13 neighborhoods), and grocery availability is competitive among Lavaca County neighborhoods (5th of 13), which supports day-to-day livability albeit at small-town scale.

The property’s 2005 construction is newer than the neighborhood’s average vintage of 1987, suggesting relative competitiveness versus older local stock. Investors should still plan for mid-life systems upkeep and potential light renovations to maintain positioning against newer deliveries elsewhere in the region.

Neighborhood renter concentration sits around the metro middle based on the share of renter-occupied housing units (above the national median), indicating a tenant base that can support smaller multifamily properties but is thinner than large urban markets. Median school quality in the area is competitive among Lavaca County neighborhoods (5th of 13; above the national median), which can aid family-oriented retention.

Home values track near national midrange, and value-to-income metrics are above national medians. Paired with comparatively modest contract rents, this creates a high-cost ownership market relative to local incomes that can sustain reliance on rental options while moderating near-term pricing power. Overall neighborhood performance is mid-pack in the metro (7th of 13; B-), with occupancy within the neighborhood on the lower end of the metro distribution—an important consideration for underwriting and lease-up pacing.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Public crime benchmarks specific to this neighborhood are not available in WDSuite for the current period. As with many rural markets, safety perceptions can vary by block and over time. Investors typically compare neighborhood-level trends to county and state references and review local reporting to inform on-site risk management and tenant retention strategies.

Proximity to Major Employers

Regional employers within commuting range help support renter demand and day-to-day stability for workforce housing. Nearby employment includes foodservice distribution operations.

  • Performance Food Group — foodservice distribution (44.6 miles)
Why invest?

This 20-unit, small-format asset built in 2005 offers durable workforce housing characteristics in a rural Texas setting. Rents in the surrounding neighborhood sit at attainable levels, which can support occupancy stability and retention, while ownership costs trend higher relative to incomes—factors that often sustain multifamily demand. Based on CRE market data from WDSuite, the neighborhood’s occupancy trends are softer relative to the metro, so conservative lease-up and renewal assumptions are prudent.

The 2005 vintage is newer than the area’s average stock, giving a competitive edge versus older properties, though investors should budget for mid-life capital items and strategic updates. Given moderate amenity density and a renter base around the metro middle, the thesis centers on steady, needs-based tenancy rather than premium rent growth.

  • Newer 2005 construction relative to local stock supports competitive positioning
  • Attainable neighborhood rents can aid retention and stabilize occupancy
  • Ownership costs near national midrange reinforce reliance on rental options
  • Rural setting with basic amenities suits workforce demand over premium positioning
  • Risk: Neighborhood occupancy trends sit on the lower end of the metro; underwrite conservatively