150 Slampa Dr Avinger Tx 75630 Us 9a6ed8e02f87dcbff1c342702a7c8692
150 Slampa Dr, Avinger, TX, 75630, US
Neighborhood Overall
B-
Schools-
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing19thPoor
Demographics45thGood
Amenities18thGood
Safety Details
-
National Percentile
-
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
-
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address150 Slampa Dr, Avinger, TX, 75630, US
Region / MetroAvinger
Year of Construction1983
Units40
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

150 Slampa Dr, Avinger TX Multifamily Investment

Rural 40‑unit asset positioned for value-add and stabilization in Marion County; according to WDSuite’s CRE market data, neighborhood occupancy has been trending upward, supporting a pragmatic lease-up plan.

Overview

Located in a rural pocket of Marion County, the property sits in a neighborhood rated B- where amenity density is limited, yet park access is comparatively better than many rural peers. Park access ranks competitive locally and near the middle nationally, while restaurants are modest but serviceable for a workforce tenant base. Overall amenities score below national averages, which suggests residents may rely on nearby towns for services.

The average construction year in the neighborhood is 1975, and this property’s 1983 vintage is somewhat newer than much of the local stock. For investors, that can mean relatively competitive positioning versus older comparables, with typical planning for system updates and targeted renovations to drive rentability.

Neighborhood occupancy is below national norms but has improved in recent years, per WDSuite’s commercial real estate analysis. Renter concentration appears limited locally, which points to a thinner tenant pool; however, steady improvement in occupied housing supports a cautious but constructive view on stabilization and retention when operations are tightly managed.

Demographic statistics are aggregated within a 3‑mile radius and indicate a smaller average household size, which can support demand for smaller-format apartments. Home values are relatively low for Texas, making ownership more accessible and potentially competing with rentals; pricing and value-add strategy should therefore emphasize convenience and quality to sustain leasing velocity and resident retention.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Detailed crime ranks for this neighborhood are not available in the current dataset. Investors typically benchmark rural Marion County locations against county and regional trends, focusing on property-level measures (lighting, access control, and visibility) and confirming patterns with local public safety reports and insurer guidance.

Proximity to Major Employers
  • Sysco — foodservice distribution offices (26.8 miles)
Why invest?

This 1983, 40‑unit property offers a value-add path in a rural Texas submarket where neighborhood occupancy has been improving, according to CRE market data from WDSuite. The asset is newer than much of the surrounding housing stock, positioning renovations to sharpen competitive standing against older comparables while targeting steady lease-up and retention.

Tenant demand is supported by smaller average household sizes within 3 miles and modest service amenities, while more accessible homeownership in the area argues for disciplined pricing and visible quality upgrades. Execution focus should center on targeted interior updates, property maintenance, and leasing operations that emphasize convenience, minimizing turnover risk as occupancy trends continue to firm.

  • Newer-than-neighborhood vintage (1983) with clear value-add and modernization levers
  • Improving neighborhood occupancy supports a pragmatic stabilization plan
  • Smaller household sizes within 3 miles broaden the renter pool for compact units
  • Risk: more accessible ownership locally can compete with rentals—pricing and quality differentiation are key
  • Rural location with limited amenities underscores the importance of on-site appeal and management