7925 Rockwood Ln Austin Tx 78757 Us 78904013f465d4583dee0d17baefbae2
7925 Rockwood Ln, Austin, TX, 78757, US
Neighborhood Overall
A
Schools
SummaryNational Percentile
Rank vs Metro
Housing65thFair
Demographics72ndGood
Amenities76thBest
Safety Details
19th
National Percentile
41%
1 Year Change - Violent Offense
7%
1 Year Change - Property Offense

Multifamily Valuation

Choose method * NOI provides best results.

The Automated Valuation Model is an estimate of market value. It is not an appraisal, broker opinion of value, or a replacement for professional judgement.
Property Details
Address7925 Rockwood Ln, Austin, TX, 78757, US
Region / MetroAustin
Year of Construction1977
Units105
Transaction Date---
Transaction Price---
Buyer---
Seller---

7925 Rockwood Ln Austin Multifamily Investment

Neighborhood fundamentals point to durable renter demand and high occupancy relative to the metro, according to WDSuite’s CRE market data. Focus here is on stabilized operations with upside from targeted modernization rather than lease-up risk.

Overview

This Inner Suburb location in Austin benefits from strong day-to-day convenience: restaurants and cafes are dense for the metro and well above national norms, while groceries and pharmacies are readily accessible. These amenities support leasing velocity and resident retention, per commercial real estate analysis benchmarks from WDSuite.

Neighborhood occupancy is high compared with other Austin neighborhoods and sits in the upper tiers nationally; this indicates a tight local rental market. Note that occupancy figures are measured for the neighborhood, not the property.

Within a 3-mile radius, household counts have increased in recent years and are projected to continue growing, pointing to a larger tenant base ahead. Population growth is modest, but smaller average household sizes mean more households — a supportive backdrop for multifamily demand and occupancy stability.

The area skews toward higher-income households and elevated home values relative to many U.S. neighborhoods. That ownership cost profile tends to sustain rental demand and can aid pricing power for well-maintained assets, while still requiring disciplined lease management where rent-to-income can pressure retention at renewal.

Vintage in the neighborhood averages early-1970s. With a 1977 construction year, this asset is slightly newer than the neighborhood norm, providing relative competitiveness versus older stock; investors should still underwrite ongoing system upgrades and selective renovations to preserve positioning.

Industry research & expert perspectives - free access for everyone.
AVM
Safety & Crime Trends

Safety indicators for the neighborhood track below national percentiles, and the area ranks in the lower half among 527 Austin metro neighborhoods. This context suggests investors should incorporate prudent security measures and underwriting assumptions aligned with comparable submarkets rather than premium-tier safety expectations.

Recent year-over-year readings indicate a general uptick in both property and violent offense rates at the neighborhood level. Emphasize standard best practices — lighting, access control, and resident engagement — and compare trends against nearby Austin neighborhoods to calibrate expense reserves and retention strategies.

Proximity to Major Employers

Proximity to established employers supports a wide commuter tenant base and can help stabilize leasing. Nearby corporate offices span consumer goods, software, industrial supplies, insurance, and grocery headquarters, reinforcing demand for workforce and professional renters.

  • Coca-Cola — consumer goods offices (1.4 miles)
  • Adobe — software (2.9 miles)
  • Airgas — industrial gases (3.2 miles)
  • New York Life — insurance (3.8 miles)
  • Whole Foods Market — grocery retail (6.3 miles) — HQ
Why invest?

The investment case centers on tight neighborhood occupancy, amenity depth, and a high-income renter base that supports stable operations. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, the neighborhood’s occupancy levels are above metro averages and competitive nationally, reinforcing near-term leasing durability. Elevated ownership costs in the area typically sustain renter reliance on multifamily housing, benefiting retention and pricing for well-kept assets.

Built in 1977, the property is slightly newer than the neighborhood’s early-1970s average, offering relative competitiveness versus older stock. The 3-mile radius shows ongoing household growth and projected increases ahead, indicating a larger tenant pool over time. Underwriting should budget for targeted system upgrades and modernization to capture value-add returns while maintaining operating stability.

  • High neighborhood occupancy supports leasing stability and cash flow resilience.
  • Amenity-rich location near major employers underpins renter demand and retention.
  • 1977 vintage offers a slight edge versus older area stock with selective value-add potential.
  • Elevated ownership costs in the area support sustained demand for multifamily rentals.
  • Risks: safety metrics trail national percentiles and parks are limited; plan for security measures and community activation to support retention.