| Summary | National Percentile | Rank vs Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Housing | 35th | Fair |
| Demographics | 71st | Best |
| Amenities | 5th | Fair |
Multifamily Valuation
| Property Details | |
|---|---|
| Address | 2010 Lindy St, Graham, TX, 76450, US |
| Region / Metro | Graham |
| Year of Construction | 1985 |
| Units | 40 |
| Transaction Date | --- |
| Transaction Price | --- |
| Buyer | --- |
| Seller | --- |
2010 Lindy St, Graham TX Multifamily Investment
Neighborhood occupancy trends sit above the metro median and rents skew toward the lower end of the market, supporting retention and steady cash flow, according to WDSuites CRE market data. For investors, the combination points to durability in a rural setting with measured rent growth potential.
The property sits in a Rural neighborhood of Graham rated B- among 9 metro neighborhoods, with occupancy performance ranked above the metro median. That mix suggests stable leasing conditions even as the area remains lower density and car-dependent.
Amenities are limited locally (restaurants, cafes, parks, and pharmacies are sparse), so resident appeal leans on small-town convenience and access to everyday services concentrated in Graham. From an investor standpoint, this typically favors tenants who prioritize value and proximity over lifestyle amenity density.
Rents in the neighborhood benchmark well below national levels (median contract rent ranks in the lower national bands), which supports retention but moderates immediate pricing power. Home values are also on the lower side nationally, meaning ownership is relatively more accessible than in high-cost metros; that can create competition with entry-level homeownership, so underwriting should emphasize value positioning and service quality.
Tenure patterns indicate a modest renter concentration (renter-occupied share sits in the lower national percentiles). For multifamily demand, this implies a smaller but steady tenant base where leasing stability is supported by affordability and local employment ties rather than in-migration. Demographic statistics within a 3-mile radius show median household income and educational attainment tracking above national averages, which can aid collections and renewal probability without requiring premium amenity packages, based on commercial real estate analysis from WDSuite.
The average construction year in the neighborhood is newer than the propertys 1985 vintage. That gap points to potential value-add through interior updates and systems modernization to remain competitive against slightly newer stock while planning for targeted capital expenditures.

Comparable safety metrics for this neighborhood are not available in WDSuites dataset. Investors commonly benchmark at the county or metro level and supplement with insurer guidance, property-level incident logs, and management practices to assess risk and operating costs.
This 40-unit, 1985-vintage asset in Graham benefits from a neighborhood with above-median metro occupancy and rent levels that are comparatively low nationwidea profile that tends to support steady retention and predictable cash flows. According to CRE market data from WDSuite, the renter-occupied share is modest, so demand is driven more by local workforce stability than by rapid household growth, reinforcing the case for value-oriented positioning.
With nearby housing costs relatively accessible and amenities limited, competitive advantage hinges on dependable operations, responsive management, and selective renovations. The 1985 vintage creates clear value-add pathways (interiors and building systems) to defend occupancy versus newer local stock while maintaining affordability that sustains the tenant base.
- Above-metro occupancy supports leasing stability and predictable cash flow.
- Rent levels below national norms aid renewals and reduce turnover risk.
- 1985 vintage offers value-add levers through targeted unit and systems upgrades.
- Modest renter concentration implies a smaller but durable tenant base tied to local employment.
- Risks: limited local amenities and relatively accessible ownership options can temper pricing power; focus on operations and positioning.